|
 |
Monthly Dinner Meeting
October 8, 2007 |
Early Registration
Ends at 5:00pm on the Wednesday before
the Dinner Meeting.
Late Registration
Ends at noon on the Friday before the dinner
meeting.
Registration Questions
Please call (248) 643-6590.
Dinner and seat availability cannot be
guaranteed without advance registration. |
| |
PMIGLC Dinner Meeting
Location: Management
Education Center
Title: It's Not How
You Do the Work, It's How You Do The Work Together
By: Sid Henkin, VP
of Market Innovation for Prism Learning Solutions,
and Sr. Consultant with Cutter Consortium's
Agile Project Management practice
Time:
Check-in ~ 6:00pm
Dinner ~ 6:30pm
Presentation ~ 7:30pm
|
|
PMIGLC Forum
Title: Part 1 of 2
(Part 2 at the November Dinner Meeting)
ABCD Risk Management
By: Peter Hasek, Principle,
Pharos Guild llc.
Forum Time: 5:30-6:30
- Before the Dinner Meeting
Fees: $20 (Member),
$25 (Non-member)
PDUs: Earn 2.5 PDUs
by attending the dinner meeting and the
forum; forum only…1 PDU.
NOTE:
Please note that registration is on a first-come, first-serve basis and that
seating is limited to 35 people. There is no guarantee that if you register
for the first session in October that you are guaranteed a seat in the second
session in November.
 |
PDU Code C011-100807F |
|
|
|
Dinner Meeting Presentation
Abstract
This presentation focuses on how to achieve the
critical balance between the two realms of a high
performing team, the technical/operational realm
and the behavioral realm. Historically, teams focus
on the technical competencies of its members and
leave the behavioral alignment to chance. We often
hear comments like, “give it time” or “the team
is starting to gel”. We often trust team development
to an evolutionary process that's problematic at
best.
Addressing Half the Problem is Not Enough
For a majority of organizations trying to achieve
exceptional team performance, the focus has been
on each team member's technical competence. The
assumption is simple: if you get the right technical
skill sets on the team, results will follow. If
this were the case we would have a lot more successful
teams than we do. This assumption addresses only
half the challenge. Technical competence is something
you can get your arms around. It can be defined
and in most cases, observed objectively.
The Other Half of the Problem: Just As You
Suspected
Recent research has supported what most of us
have also observed: it's how the team members interact
that has most significant impact on team success.
We have all observed teams that have very technically
competent members, but fail to perform up to expectations.
We understand the impact of behavioral compatibility,
but how do we address it?
The traditional forms of team building training
do not provide an effective way, a measurable way,
to uncover the behavioral gaps in team performance,
much less prescribe specific methods for bridging
those gaps.
We have observed that many teams responsible for
critical deliverables i.e. project teams and IT
teams have a low tolerance for any activity that
does not directly impact their ability to get work
done. As one project leader put it ‘we don't have
the time to hold hands and sing ‘Kum Ba Yah'
The Missing Piece of the Team Performance Puzzle
This presentation will focus on how team and individual
behavior can be measured, analyzed and adapted
to create high performance, quickly and effectively. |
Speaker Biography
Sid Henkin has more than 25 years of experience
developing processes and tools to accelerate team
development and improve team performance. He works
extensively in helping organizations transition
from directive to collaborative environments. He
applies technology and an empirical approach to
the issue of balancing technical competence and
behavioral alignment for high performance teams.
He has developed customer and team development
programs for many of the world's largest transnational
organizations, both in the private and public sectors.
Sid is internationally recognized as an authority
on individual and team behavior in the workplace.
He has developed customer and team development
programs for many of the world's largest transnational
organizations, both in the private and public sectors.
Sid is Vice President of Market Innovation for
Prism Learning Solutions, based in Farmington Hills,
Michigan and is a Senior Consultant with Cutter
Consortium's Agile
Project Management practice.
He also serves on the Board of Directors of the
International Federation of Training and Development
Organisations, a United Nations Non-Government
Organization.
Sid has been a behavioral consultant and program
developer for over twenty-five years.
Sid is a frequent speaker and presenter at both
national and international conferences on the topics
of Accelerating Team Development, Increasing team
Productivity and the Impact of Behavior on Performance
Management . He is published in trade and professional
journals in both North and South America. as well
as a contributing author to numerous management
and team development books and periodicals. |
 |
|
FORUM INFORMATION
Presentation Abstract:
ABCD Risk Management is a highly disciplined
methodology for identifying, evaluating, prioritizing,
and managing risks. The process is unique in
several ways:
- Sources of risks and potential risks are
identified;
- Risks are evaluated and prioritized using
four specific criteria;
- The criteria are qualitative, not quantitative.
The process also makes clear distinctions
between issues, problems, and risks; these
are frequently confused. The process also relates
risks to assumptions, based on an assumption
analysis. The management structure for documenting,
managing, and reporting risks and risk status
is clearly defined.
Participant Objectives
- Understand and be able to apply the definitions
of problems, issues, risks, and assumptions.
- Understand and be able to apply the evaluation
criteria to assumptions and risks.
- Understand and be able to perform an assumption
analysis
- Understand and be able to perform the risk
prioritization process
This is not intended as a training course, but
rather as a familiarization course. It necessarily
requires two sessions because of the breadth
and complexity of the methodology. The first
two objectives will be covered in the first session,
Objectives 3 & 4 in the second session.
Presenter:
Peter A. Hasek, PMP, is an independent consultant
recently retired from EDS . He has a Masters
degree in Physics and over 25 years of project
management experience in the aerospace, automotive,
and information technology industries. Mr. Hasek
has created and presented workshops and seminars
on Risk Management and Earned Value Management
Systems to business organizations and PMI chapters.
He holds a patent for a highly successful approach
to teaching both of these concepts. Mr. Hasek
is also a recognized subject matter expert in
Microsoft Project, Risk Management, and Quality
Function Deployment, and has conducted a number
of classes on those topics. He has published
articles in the MPA Project Network quarterly
journal. He is a Certified Business Manager (
CBM ).
|
|
|
|
|